Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms?

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 1 year 3 days ago #64208

  • Cool Cat
  • Cool Cat's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • I love computers and dirt bikes
  • Posts: 701
  • Thank you received: 224
TomTom wrote:
Cool Cat wrote:
nadcombo wrote:
that stupid oboma is the reason, by taking our guns, we cant defend ourselves. and seriously, does he expect a criminal to walk up and say, 'I'm gonna take this gun and go kill somebody'. no! so if we had guns, and there was a shooter, the people could neutralize him, saving lives. as for accsedents, PUT THE SAFTY ON!!!!!
Watch ur mouth buddy! Calm down! Not Cool!

Why? It's true.

First of all it is NOT true and second nobody should be calling Obama stupid. I don't like him either, but he is a human being to.
My website: HighGearMX.simplesite.com
Dirt bikes+computers= :-)
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 4 weeks ago #64474

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
Cool Cat wrote:
TomTom wrote:
Cool Cat wrote:
nadcombo wrote:
that stupid oboma is the reason, by taking our guns, we cant defend ourselves. and seriously, does he expect a criminal to walk up and say, 'I'm gonna take this gun and go kill somebody'. no! so if we had guns, and there was a shooter, the people could neutralize him, saving lives. as for accsedents, PUT THE SAFTY ON!!!!!
Watch ur mouth buddy! Calm down! Not Cool!

Why? It's true.

First of all it is NOT true and second nobody should be calling Obama stupid. I don't like him either, but he is a human being to.


Obama's not stupid, just the people that follow him.
Last Edit: 11 months 3 weeks ago by TomTom.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 4 weeks ago #64479

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
Cool Cat wrote:
TomTom wrote:
Cool Cat wrote:
nadcombo wrote:
that stupid oboma is the reason, by taking our guns, we cant defend ourselves. and seriously, does he expect a criminal to walk up and say, 'I'm gonna take this gun and go kill somebody'. no! so if we had guns, and there was a shooter, the people could neutralize him, saving lives. as for accsedents, PUT THE SAFTY ON!!!!!
Watch ur mouth buddy! Calm down! Not Cool!

Why? It's true.

First of all it is NOT true and second nobody should be calling Obama stupid. I don't like him either, but he is a human being to.

Obama's a human? I thought he was a demon.

Second, how is it not true? Huh?
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 4 weeks ago #64481

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
Cool Cat wrote:
TomTom wrote:
Cool Cat wrote:
nadcombo wrote:
that stupid oboma is the reason, by taking our guns, we cant defend ourselves. and seriously, does he expect a criminal to walk up and say, 'I'm gonna take this gun and go kill somebody'. no! so if we had guns, and there was a shooter, the people could neutralize him, saving lives. as for accsedents, PUT THE SAFTY ON!!!!!
Watch ur mouth buddy! Calm down! Not Cool!

Why? It's true.

First of all it is NOT true and second nobody should be calling Obama stupid. I don't like him either, but he is a human being to.

You shouldn’t have replied; it's offensive towards those who have no fingers.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 4 weeks ago #64483

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
Cool Cat wrote:
TomTom wrote:
Cool Cat wrote:
nadcombo wrote:
that stupid oboma is the reason, by taking our guns, we cant defend ourselves. and seriously, does he expect a criminal to walk up and say, 'I'm gonna take this gun and go kill somebody'. no! so if we had guns, and there was a shooter, the people could neutralize him, saving lives. as for accsedents, PUT THE SAFTY ON!!!!!
Watch ur mouth buddy! Calm down! Not Cool!

Why? It's true.

First of all it is NOT true and second nobody should be calling Obama stupid. I don't like him either, but he is a human being to.

Hey, hey hey. Why so serious?
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 4 weeks ago #64533

@tomtom, you know, you like totally dominate this thread... so congratulations
"Some wish to live within the sound of a chapel bell, I wish to run a rescue mission within a yard of hell." -- C.T Studd 20th century missionary
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: bush possum

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 3 weeks ago #64686

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
TomTom wrote:
bush possum wrote:
TomTom wrote:
bush possum wrote:
TomTom wrote:
bush possum wrote:
TomTom wrote:
SirGeneralCliche wrote:
TomTom wrote:
Servant wrote:
Going4God wrote:
Please note:
-There have been 179 mass shootings in the US so far in 2016
-This is the 191st day of 2016 (July 9)
-7,119 people have been killed by guns this year, including 317 children and 1,546 teens
-1,177 deaths by accidental shooting
-You’re more likely to be shot to death in the United States than you are to die in a car accident in Canada
-Death by firearms in the US per 100,000 people surpasses most leading causes of death in Canada

Sources: gunviolencearchive.org, globalnews.ca

Is it really a right to bear arms? Does it protect or does it kill? Is it worth it?
Why do people still want to own guns after reading this? I think it's a great idea to get rid of guns.

Come and take them. I won't give up my freedom for safety, because then my safety would disappear.

Cut her some slack. She was just stating her opinion; she never actually told anyone to follow it.

Yes Ma'am
Ma'am or Sir? :P

Well, I saw your gender is female, and I wanted to be polite, so...

Ps, sorry if I missed a joke. I don't always get them.
Welllll, Up to my comment ma'am or sir (which was a joke btw lol) I hadn't posted in that series.... lol and the person you said yes ma'am to is a guy, so..... :silly:


Oops. I thought you had said that
Haha no worries, yeah as Sir said it gets confusling... :huh:
Hey this is becoming another quotable quote!

Say what?

Wan't me to quote you on that?
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 3 weeks ago #64687

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
notturningaside wrote:
@tomtom, you know, you like totally dominate this thread... so congratulations

Wait, what? I'm just having fun here.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 3 weeks ago #64823

  • SirGeneralCliche
  • SirGeneralCliche's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Ima just a regular guy...
  • Posts: 668
  • Thank you received: 530
Hey TomTom, I just wanted to say something

Sometimes it's hard to tell wether or not you are joking about something. Without the context of facial expression and tone of voice, people might take a sarcastic jest as being very offensive.

Nothing personal just sayin
All rules have exceptions, including this one.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 2 weeks ago #64879

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
bush possum wrote:
TomTom wrote:
TomTom wrote:
bush possum wrote:
TomTom wrote:
bush possum wrote:
TomTom wrote:
bush possum wrote:
TomTom wrote:
SirGeneralCliche wrote:
TomTom wrote:
Servant wrote:
Going4God wrote:
Please note:
-There have been 179 mass shootings in the US so far in 2016
-This is the 191st day of 2016 (July 9)
-7,119 people have been killed by guns this year, including 317 children and 1,546 teens
-1,177 deaths by accidental shooting
-You’re more likely to be shot to death in the United States than you are to die in a car accident in Canada
-Death by firearms in the US per 100,000 people surpasses most leading causes of death in Canada

Sources: gunviolencearchive.org, globalnews.ca

Is it really a right to bear arms? Does it protect or does it kill? Is it worth it?
Why do people still want to own guns after reading this? I think it's a great idea to get rid of guns.

Come and take them. I won't give up my freedom for safety, because then my safety would disappear.

Cut her some slack. She was just stating her opinion; she never actually told anyone to follow it.

Yes Ma'am
Ma'am or Sir? :P

Well, I saw your gender is female, and I wanted to be polite, so...

Ps, sorry if I missed a joke. I don't always get them.
Welllll, Up to my comment ma'am or sir (which was a joke btw lol) I hadn't posted in that series.... lol and the person you said yes ma'am to is a guy, so..... :silly:


Oops. I thought you had said that
Haha no worries, yeah as Sir said it gets confusling... :huh:
Hey this is becoming another quotable quote!

Say what?

Wan't me to quote you on that?
?? No soz, I forgot all about that post. Btw what does you means by say whats? :blink:

I was just joking
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: bush possum

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 2 weeks ago #64894

@tomtom, i know, its just most posts here are yours :P
"Some wish to live within the sound of a chapel bell, I wish to run a rescue mission within a yard of hell." -- C.T Studd 20th century missionary
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 2 weeks ago #64968

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
SirGeneralCliche wrote:
Hey TomTom, I just wanted to say something

Sometimes it's hard to tell wether or not you are joking about something. Without the context of facial expression and tone of voice, people might take a sarcastic jest as being very offensive.

Nothing personal just sayin



I understand you, but trollI people a lot. And I'm not going to be quiet about my personal beliefs just because someone disagrees with me and gets offended because of it.. Just saying.

And it is hard to tell who's being serious or not on here. But I'm sarcastic a lot. And serious sometimes, and again, I troll people a lot. Does that clear it up?
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 2 weeks ago #64969

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
notturningaside wrote:
@tomtom, i know, its just most posts here are yours :P


Well, I love guns, and I don't think a government should decide on if people have the right to have them. It's a right.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Prov17

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 2 weeks ago #65081

  • SirGeneralCliche
  • SirGeneralCliche's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Ima just a regular guy...
  • Posts: 668
  • Thank you received: 530
TomTom wrote:
SirGeneralCliche wrote:
Hey TomTom, I just wanted to say something

Sometimes it's hard to tell wether or not you are joking about something. Without the context of facial expression and tone of voice, people might take a sarcastic jest as being very offensive.

Nothing personal just sayin



I understand you, but trollI people a lot. And I'm not going to be quiet about my personal beliefs just because someone disagrees with me and gets offended because of it.. Just saying.

And it is hard to tell who's being serious or not on here. But I'm sarcastic a lot. And serious sometimes, and again, I troll people a lot. Does that clear it up?
I get the trolling thing, I like to troll people too on occasion.
I was aware that you tend to be sarcastic and that you strongly believe in speaking your mind. I misworded my first statement: What I meant was that sometimes we(or at least me) can't tell wether you're being serious or joking, so there can be confusion about what your beliefs are. I'm not asking you to stop expressing your beliefs, I just think that you should tell us when you are being serious and when you're sarcastic. (Ex. by using an emoji)
Get my drift?
All rules have exceptions, including this one.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 2 weeks ago #65082

  • SirGeneralCliche
  • SirGeneralCliche's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Ima just a regular guy...
  • Posts: 668
  • Thank you received: 530
TomTom wrote:
SirGeneralCliche wrote:
Hey TomTom, I just wanted to say something

Sometimes it's hard to tell wether or not you are joking about something. Without the context of facial expression and tone of voice, people might take a sarcastic jest as being very offensive.

Nothing personal just sayin



I understand you, but trollI people a lot. And I'm not going to be quiet about my personal beliefs just because someone disagrees with me and gets offended because of it.. Just saying.

And it is hard to tell who's being serious or not on here. But I'm sarcastic a lot. And serious sometimes, and again, I troll people a lot. Does that clear it up?
I mean, when you make a joke and someone gets confused, doesn't it bug you that you have to clarify it? I think emojis could save time for everyone.
All rules have exceptions, including this one.
The administrator has disabled public write access.

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 1 week ago #65177

Some things ro remember,
- mass shootings almost always happen in gun free zones
- banning guns would start prohibition all over again (look up alcohol prohibition if you don't know what that it)
- criminals would still keep their guns because they don't follow the law
- would you rob a gun shop where every single person can aim a gun at you or a gun free store where your the only one with a gun
You just wasted your time reading this meaningless signature...

Why are you still reading?

I already told you, there's nothing interesting here.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Prov17

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 1 week ago #65262

  • TomTom
  • TomTom's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Posts: 409
  • Thank you received: 187
SirGeneralCliche wrote:
TomTom wrote:
SirGeneralCliche wrote:
Hey TomTom, I just wanted to say something

Sometimes it's hard to tell wether or not you are joking about something. Without the context of facial expression and tone of voice, people might take a sarcastic jest as being very offensive.

Nothing personal just sayin



I understand you, but troll people a lot. And I'm not going to be quiet about my personal beliefs just because someone disagrees with me and gets offended because of it.. Just saying.

And it is hard to tell who's being serious or not on here. But I'm sarcastic a lot. And serious sometimes, and again, I troll people a lot. Does that clear it up?
I mean, when you make a joke and someone gets confused, doesn't it bug you that you have to clarify it? I think emojis could save time for everyone.


well, if people get offended because someone doesn't use emojis, then the world's coming to an end. :P But I hear you.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SirGeneralCliche

Should Civilians Have the Right to Bear Arms? 11 months 6 days ago #65483

  • LolingforJesus
  • LolingforJesus's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • I love God, pianos, friends, and Bible Experience
  • Posts: 374
  • Thank you received: 215
YES! Ppl should be able to have guns! The criminals will always get guns, they don't care about the law.


HAPPY BDAY TP!!!!
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: TomTom, OUTBACK
Moderators: jreteenmom
Time to create page: 0.384 seconds